REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA

CASE NO.:081393/2024
(1)	REPORTABLE: NO
(2)	OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: NO
(3)	REVISED: NO
Date: 5 December 2024
E van der Schyff

In the application for leave to appeal between:

Vigneshvarie Pillay	First Applicant

Thomson Wilks Incorporated	Second Applicant

and

Muthray and Associates Incorporated	First Respondent

Kineil Muthray	Second Respondent

ABSA BANK Ltd	Third Respondent

Keshan Pillay	Fourth Respondent
JUDGMENT
Van der Schyff J 
[1]	The applicants in this application for leave to appeal were the second and third respondents in the main application. The parties are referred to as cited in this application for leave to appeal. The applicants seek leave to appeal against the judgment and order delivered on 17 September 2024.

[2]	I have considered the grounds for appeal noted in the application for leave to appeal. I handed down a written judgment in the matter concerned that set out the reasons for my decision. After having reflected on the papers filed of record, the judgment and order handed down, and the grounds for appeal, I am not of the opinion that the appeal would have a reasonable prospect of success if leave is granted. There is no other compelling reason why the appeal should be heard.

ORDER
In the result, the following order is granted:
1.	The application for leave to appeal by the first and second applicants (the second and third respondents in the main application) is dismissed with costs on scale A.

E van der Schyff
Judge of the High Court

Delivered:  This judgment is handed down electronically by uploading it to the electronic file of this matter on CaseLines. 

For the first and second applicants:	Adv. C. Woodrow				
Instructed by:	Thomson Wilk Incorporated			
For the first and second respondents:	Adv. E. de Lange	
Instructed by:	Muthray and Associates	
Date of the hearing:	20 November 2024
Date of judgment:	5 December 2024