IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
BRAAMFONTEIN	CASE NO:  J4638/02
2003-02-18

In the matter between 
MOHLALA, TSHWARI PHINEAS	Applicant
and
CITIBANK, N.A.						     1st Respondent
MAKOLA, C.M. N.O.					     2nd Respondent
HARTMAN, JOHAN N.O.				      3rd Respondent
VAN WYK, JOANI N.O.					     4th Respondent
________________________________________________________________
	J U D G M E N T
________________________________________________________________
REVELAS J:  
1.	This is an application for leave to appeal against a judgment handed down on 29 November 2002 by me.  At that stage the applicant had launched urgent proceedings seeking that the disciplinary proceedings instituted by the first respondent against him. be stayed pending the outcome of certain criminal proceedings regarding the same allegations which were instituted on or about 18 November 2000.  Assurances were given that these proceedings would take place.
2.	I declined to grant the relief sought by the applicant.  I have set out in a reasoned judgment why I did not grant the relief.  I have nothing to add to that judgment.  I have considered the matter, and in my view I do not believe that there is a reasonable prospect that the Labour Appeal Court would come to a different conclusion than I had come to.
3.	Consequently the application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.

____________________
E. Revelas