South Africa: High Courts - Gauteng

You are here:
SAFLII >>
Databases >>
South Africa: High Courts - Gauteng >>
2006 >>
[2006] ZAGPHC 120
| Noteup
| LawCite
Hyundai Motor Distributors (Pty) Ltd v Hyundai Plant and Equipment (Pty) Ltd (2003/7707) [2006] ZAGPHC 120 (31 October 2006)
Download original files |
IN
THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA WITWATERSRAND LOCAL DIVISION
NOT REPORTABLE Case no.: 2003/7707
In the matter between: DATE:
31/10/06
HYUNDAI
MOTOR DISTRIBUTORS (PTY)
LTD Plaintiff (IN
LIQUIDATION)
d
an
HYUNDAI
PLANT AND ECQUIPMENT (PTY) LTD
Defendant
JUDGMENT
Rabie J:
[1 ]
This is an application by the
applicant for leave to appeal against the whole of
the judgment and order, including the
award of costs, of this court granted on 17
November 2005 whereby the defendant
was ordered to pay to the plaintiff the amount
of R10 999 452,50 together with
interest thereon at the rate of 15,5% calculated from
8 August 2000 to date of payment as
well as the plaintiff's costs of suit including the
costs of two counsel and previously
reserved costs.
[2]
The plaintiff based its application
on a number of grounds set out in a Notice
of Application for Leave to Appeal.
Although I am of the view that most
of the
grounds relied upon by the applicant
has no merit, I am of the view that another court
may come to a different conclusion on
the question whether, on the state of the
pleadings
as they stand and/or the facts of the matter, the defendant could be
However, as this particular issue is,
for all practical purposes, interwoven with
-2
successful in its argument that the
plaintiff's claim was premature.
[3]
most of the other issues in the case,
and as the facts of the case relate to all the
issues
equally, I am of the view that leave to appeal should be granted as
prayed for
and
not only in respect of any particular issue.
[4]
In my view the issues involved in the
appeal are not of such a nature that they
merit the attention of the Supreme
Court of Appeal.
In the result the following order is
made:
1.
Leave is granted to appeal to the
Witwatersrand Local Division of this Court
against the whole of the judgment and
order, including the award of costs,
handed down by this court on 17
November 2005;
2.
The costs of the condonation
application shall be paid by the applicant on an
unopposed scale and the costs of the
application for leave to appeal shall be
costs in the appeal. Plaintiff's
Counsel: Plaintiff's Attorneys:
Adv Joseph SC and Adv Girdwood Cliffe
Dekker Inc
Defendant's Attorney: Adv Morrison
and Adv Stylianou Defendant's Attorneys: Alan Margolis Attorneys