South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria

You are here:
SAFLII >>
Databases >>
South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria >>
2014 >>
[2014] ZAGPPHC 441
| Noteup
| LawCite
Sheriff of the High Court, Rustenburg v Dintoe (51384/2012) [2014] ZAGPPHC 441 (29 April 2014)
Download original files |
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy |
IN THE NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA
(REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA)
Case No: 51384/2012
Date: 29 April 2014
In the matter between:
THE SHERIFF OF THE HIGH COURT
RUSTENBURG..................................................................................................................................Applicant
and
MOTLAGOILWE DINTOE.......................................................................................Respondent/Purchaser
(ID NO: 7[...])
In Re -
THE STANDARD BANK OF SOUTH AFRICA LTD.....................................................................Plaintiff
and
JUSTUS ALFRED THEODOOR BOSWEL.........................................................................First Defendant
MERCIA BOSWEL.............................................................................................................Second Defendant
(ID NO: 5[...])
JUDGMENT
JANSE VAN NIEUWENHUIZEN J
[1] This is an application in terms of the provisions of rule 46(11) of the Uniform rules of court.
[2] In terms of the rule, the sheriff should file a report and an application, which result in the incurring of unnecessary costs, is not necessary. [See: Sheriff, Hiabisa and Nongoma y Shobeka 2009 (6) SA 272 (KZN)].
ORDER
In the premises, I make the following order:
1. An order is granted in terms of prayers 1 and 2 of the notice of motion.
2. “The deposit shall be retained in trust by the Sheriff until such time as the aforesaid property has been sold to a third party and an aggrieved creditor’s loss has been quantified and judgment has been granted in respect thereof as intended by the provisions of Rule 46(11)(b).
3. Prayers 3, 5 and 6 is dismissed.
JANSE VAN NIEUWENHUIZEN J
JUDGE OF THE GAUTENG HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA