South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria

You are here:
SAFLII >>
Databases >>
South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria >>
2022 >>
[2022] ZAGPPHC 154
| Noteup
| LawCite
Dale v Riaan Du Plessis Attorneys and Conveyancers and Others (38406/2020) [2022] ZAGPPHC 154 (28 February 2022)
Download original files |
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA
CASE NO:38406/2020
DOH: 21 FEBRUARY 2022
In the matter of:
DALE IRENE Applicant
and
RIAAN DU PLESSIS ATTORNEYS & CONVEYANCERS First Respondent
JOHANNES CHRISTIAN DU PLESSIS Second Respondent
P J KLEYNHANS INCORPORATED ATTORNEYS Third Respondent
LEGAL PRACTICE COUNCIL Fourth Respondent
JUDGMENT
THIS JUDGMENT HAS BEEN HANDED DOWN REMOTELY AND SHALL BE CIRCULATED TO THE PARTIES BY WAY OF EMAIL. ITS DATE AND TIME OF 2022/02/28
A. Introduction
1. This matter was heard on 21 February 2022.
2. The second respondent practices as a sole practitioner. Thus, notwithstanding the citation of the first and second respondents, they are essentially the same person. The third and fourth respondents are not participating in this matter. For that reason, I use respondent when referring to the first and second respondents.
3. The applicant, as the party that is dominus litis, bears the responsibility to ensure that her papers are in order.
4. Rule 63 of the Uniform Rules is applicable. Ex facie the papers, Rule 63 has not been complied with. Thus, there is no application before court. On that basis, the ‘application’ cannot succeed.
B. Order
5. In the circumstances, I make the following order:
(i) The application is dismissed.
(ii) The applicant must pay the first and second respnodents’ costs.
NN BAM
JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT, PRETORIA
Appearances:
Counsel for the applicants: Adv Mureriwa
Instructed by: Makota Attorneys
For the respondents Adv Grobler SC
Instructed by: JC Du Plessis Attorneys
℅ Jansen and Jansen