---

The Attorneys’ Admission Examination 2016 Syllabus

 

In this examination candidates must have a sound knowledge of substantive law and be able to apply it regarding matters covered by this syllabus.

2016 examination dates

·        9 and 10 February 2016.

·        16 and 17 August 2016.

The registration fee is currently: First paper R 114 (incl VAT), second, third and fourth papers R 57 (incl VAT) per paper.

The examination system

The guidelines for the admission examination are set out in s 14 of the Attorneys Act 53 of 1979 (the Act).

The examination format

Candidates are allowed 15 minutes to peruse the paper before starting to answer the questions. No candidate may start writing in the answer book during this period.

·        First paper (s 14(1)(a)) – this paper is written on the first day of the examinations from 9 am to 12:15 pm.

·        Second paper (s 14(1)(c)) – this paper is written on the first day of the examinations from 2 pm to 4:15 pm.

·        Third paper (s 14(1)(c))  – this paper is written on the second day of the examinations from 9 am to 11:15 am.

·        Fourth paper (s 14(1)(b)) – this paper is written on the second day of the examinations from 2 pm to 4:15 pm.

Examination criteria

A candidate who attains 50% or more in a paper will not have to attend an oral, except if a special reason exists for calling a candidate to an oral. Candidates who achieve between 40% and 49% in any of the papers will be permitted to do an oral in respect of that paper. Candidates who attain less than 40% in any of these papers will not be given an oral and will fail the paper concerned.

Remark

Candidates who are dissatisfied with their marks in any section of the examination may have their paper remarked before orals are conducted if –

·        they apply in writing for a remark to the  provincial law society concerned within one week of the results of the examination becoming available; and

·        they pay a remark fee equivalent to twice the fee payable for the section of the examination in which the remark is requested. If the remark is successful in that the status improves (eg, failed and after remark is eligible for an oral) this fee will be refunded.

Regulations

·        A candidate may complete the four phases of the examinations in any sequence. Ideally the papers should be completed simultaneously (see r 3(2) in GN 23 GG11091/8-1-1988)).

·        Some candidates are uncertain about whether, having successfully completed a certain part of the examination, they may in the oral be examined on the part completed previously when they attempt the next paper at a later stage and are called for an oral. This is unlikely but possible. The golden thread of ethics runs through the whole examination and it can never be considered finished before the whole examination has been completed. Questions concerning ethical matters and questions concerning the rules of a specific law society may be asked at all times.

Composition of the papers

·        Section 14 of the Act prescribes the appointment of examiners.

·        Examiners and experts in the various fields set the papers. Moderators, appointed from the ranks of the examiners, check, discuss and approve these papers.

Practical orientation

Although the emphasis in the examination is on practical aspects, this can never be totally separated from a thorough knowledge of the law, the Acts with regulations and the rules of court.

Allocation of marks

The allocation of marks is a good indication of the detail required. Do your planning for each section accordingly.

General

·        Unless you are informed of the contrary, all questions should be answered with reference to the current rules, legislation etcetera.

·        Do not spend two hours on one section of a three-hour paper consisting of four questions; it is futile to attain 80% in two questions and only 20% in the other two questions. Determine beforehand the amount of time needed for each question and keep to your timing.

·        Copies of previous papers and answer guides are available from the Legal Education and Development (LEAD) section of the Law Society of South Africa. Contact Sipho Mdluli at (012) 441 4611.

Guide to the nature and scope of the Attorney’s Admission Examination (syllabus)

1 Introduction

In terms of s 14 of the Act, examinations are conducted in respect of:

– s 14(1)(a) of the Act: High court, magistrates court, criminal procedure and motor vehicle accidents.

– s 14(1)(b) of the Act: Practical attorney’s bookkeeping.

– s 14(1)(c) of the Act: The practice, functions and duties of an attorney including administration of estates.

·        At present the examination is conducted as follows:

– First paper: High Court procedure, magistrate’s court procedure, motor vehicle accidents (Road Accident Fund claims) and criminal procedure. This paper is set as a three hour paper and counts 100 marks.

– Second paper: Administration of estates; drafting of wills and succession. This paper is set as a one and a half hour paper, but two hours are allowed for completing it to allow candidates to read the questions carefully before answering them. This paper counts 100 marks.

– Third paper: General attorney’s practice, namely, the practice, duties, ethics and functions of an attorney. This paper is set as a one and a half hour paper, but two hours are allowed for completing it to allow candidates to read the questions carefully before answering them. The paper counts 100 marks.

– Fourth paper: Attorney’s bookkeeping. This paper is set as a one and a half hour paper but two hours are allowed for completing it. The paper counts 100 marks.

·        A candidate may complete the four papers of the examination in any sequence. Ideally the papers should be completed simultaneously (see GG op cit).

·        In general terms, candidates are tested in the written paper on their ability to draft and record matters related to the fields of practice set out above. It is obvious that they cannot be tested without also testing their ability to apply the relevant substantive law. The written test is fundamental to the success or failure of the candidate. Candidates who have to present themselves for oral examinations will be tested on their verbal presentation of legal knowledge. Special attention is given to the practical application of the particular fields of law, and to candidates’ knowledge and insight into the ethical standards applicable to an attorney’s practice.

The examinations are conducted with a view to establishing whether candidates meet these standards. Examination questions may be set with more than one object in view. In a single question, candidates may be tested on their knowledge of the rules and practice in the courts in whose jurisdiction they are examined and, simultaneously, they may be tested on their ability to examine and analyse facts placed before them, to apply the substantive law to the facts and to draft documents logically and coherently based on the facts that are relevant.

Similarly, a question may test the ability of the candidates to find the applicable law by using facilities such as encyclopaedias, textbooks, journals, indices and the like (whether by electronic means or hard copies), and to reduce such material into an effective letter, opinion or argument before a court or other tribunal. Candidates are also expected to have reasonable practical knowledge of proper procedures to be applied in a well-run office.

2 Nature of the examination: Objectives

The content of the syllabus (and the nature of the examination) aims at ensuring that candidates have certain skills and experience. The level expected is that of a newly admitted attorney in a general medium-sized firm. This implies the following:

·        Candidates must have a general understanding of the role of the attorney as a practitioner and an officer of court, of the role of the legal profession in society, of the ethics of the profession and an ability to recognise conflicts of interest and ethical difficulties. Candidates will be required to know the rules of the law society of the province in which they are being examined, in as far as they relate to professional conduct.

·        Candidates must be competent and have adequate experience in the basic skills and techniques of attorneys and for that purpose –

– be able to handle facts and apply legal principles to factual situations;

– be able to research legal problems and to use the sources of law;

– have knowledge of the practical aspects of advocacy (the arguing of elementary cases before courts and tribunals and the effective presentation of written legal arguments), which shall include knowledge of negotiation (eg, to settle the terms of an agreement, out of court settlements, finalising disputes without recourse to the courts), the preparation for and the conduct of a trial in the High Court, the magistrate’s court and other tribunals, the gathering and preparation of evidence and the procedures relating to the calling of witnesses in civil and criminal courts;

– understand office procedures and routines, including the keeping of attorney’s books and the preparation and rendering of bills of cost and accounts and administer the affairs of clients;

–

---