Court Roll: KwaZulu-Natal High Court (Durban)
You are here:
SAFLII >>
Databases >>
Court Roll: KwaZulu-Natal High Court (Durban) >>
2021 >>
[2021] ZAKZDHCRolls 131
| Noteup
| LawCite
KwaZulu-Natal High Court Roll (Durban) (15 September 2021)
Download original files |
PDF format
RTF formatIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
KWAZULU-NATAL LOCAL DIVISION, DURBAN
COMMENCING AT DURBAN ON WEDNESDAY, 15th SEPTEMBER 2021
TO BE HEARD BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE CHILI
EMAIL ADDRESS: CMbutuma@judiciary.org.za (Cynthia)
Landline: 031 362 5811
|
1.
|
12771/17 |
SB GUARANTEE COMPANY (RF) PTY LTD vs IS GOUWS & ANO |
APPLICATION FOR PROP EXECUTABLE |
|
2.
|
D3199/21 |
NEDBANK LTD vs SN THUSINI |
DEFAULT JUDGMENT FOR PROP EXECUTABLE |
|
3.
|
D5403/21 |
PHAMACO DISTRIBUTION vs S SINGH |
DEFAULT JUDGMENT FOR PROP EXECUTABLE |
|
4.
|
D06/21 |
CHANGING TIDES vs R PORAN & ANO |
DEFAULT JUDGMENT FOR PROP EXECUTABLE |
|
5.
|
D9332/19 |
NEDBANK LTD vs AA PILLAY |
DEFAULT JUDGMENT FOR PROP EXECUTABLE |
|
6.
|
D818/19 |
STD BANK OF SA LTD vs JH MULLER |
DEFAULT JUDGMENT FOR PROP EXECUTABLE |
|
7.
|
992/18 |
BMW FINANCIAL SERVICES (SA) PTY LTD vs K MOODLEY |
SUMMARY JUDGMENT |
|
8.
|
D7362/20 |
WD EARLY vs CL EARLY |
APPLICATIONS |
|
9.
|
D3732/21 |
MAXENJIM vs A PEENS & ANO |
APPLICATIONS |
|
10.
|
D1171/19 |
JS ELS vs ROAD ACCIDENT FUND |
APPLICATIONS |
|
11.
|
D5064/21 |
SB MAZIBUKO vs FP MAZIBUKO |
APPLICATIONS |
|
12.
|
D5104/21 |
NA MOKOENA & ANO vs Q MKHWANAZI |
APPLICATIONS |
|
13.
|
10574/14 |
FA HACK vs F EBRAHIM |
APPLICATIONS |
|
14.
|
D8768/20 |
JS ALI vs NS LALU |
APPLICATIONS |
|
15.
|
D2470/20 |
P RAMJATHAN vs THE MINISTER OF POLICE & ORS |
APPLICATIONS |
|
16.
|
D9982/19 |
NS DLAMINI vs ROAD ACCIDENT FUND |
APPLICATIONS |
|
17.
|
D5383/21 |
BIDVEST BANK LTD vs N SINGH |
APPLICATIONS |
|
18.
|
10741/16 |
BR MAZIBUKE vs ROAD ACCIDENT FUND |
APPLICATIONS |
|
19.
|
D5099/21 |
OLD MUTUAL INSURE LTD vs RONNIE’S TOWLINES & RECOVERY |
APPLICATIONS |
|
20.
|
D5557/20 |
ZF MTHEMBU vs ROAD ACCIDENT FUND |
APPLICATIONS |
|
21.
|
D4678/21 |
JSW AFONSO N.O. & ORS vs GG VAN SCHALKWYK |
APPLICATIONS |
|
22.
|
10839/16 |
NEDBANK LTD vs S MANTENGU |
APPLICATIONS |
|
23.
|
5472/21 |
K THULANI vs ROAD ACCIDENT FUND |
APPLICATIONS |
|
24.
|
D9958/18 |
BB JAYISA vs ROAD ACCIDENT FUND |
APPLICATIONS |
|
25.
|
D5077/21 |
AE COETZEE vs C MUNRO |
APPLICATIONS |
|
26.
|
D1657/20 |
JD ALEXANDER vs ROAD ACCIDENT FUND |
APPLICATIONS |
|
27.
|
D5435/21 |
M NAIDOO & ANO |
APPLICATIONS |
|
28.
|
D5190/21 |
FIRSTRAND BANK LTD vs S REDDY |
APPLICATIONS |
|
29.
|
5471/21 |
SW MOLEFE vs ROAD ACCIDENT FUND |
APPLICATIONS |
|
30.
|
D4336/21 |
S MCOBOTHI vs ROAD ACCIDENT FUND |
APPLICATIONS |
|
31.
|
5473/21 |
ZM MKIZE vs ROAD ACCIDENT FUND |
APPLICATIONS |
|
32.
|
4274/17 |
O NCANANE vs ROAD ACCIDENT FUND |
APPLICATIONS |
|
33.
|
D3519/21 |
D GIANCHAND vs REGISTRAR OF DEEDS, PMB & ANO |
APPLICATIONS |
|
34.
|
D5384/21 |
BIDVEST BANK LTD vs WEZIMALI CONSULTANTS (PTY) LTD & ORS |
APPLICATIONS |
|
35.
|
D7005/19 |
DW NGCOGO vs ROAD ACCIDENT FUND |
APPLICATIONS |
|
36.
|
D4146/21 |
ERF 1422 DOUGLASDALE vs SINGATHA AFRICA DEVELOPMENT |
LIQUIDATION / WINDING-UP |
|
37.
|
D4192/21 |
A-M LABUSHAGNE vs CRINKLEY BOTTOM |
LIQUIDATION / WINDING-UP |
|
38.
|
D3837/21 |
BETHLEN BODY CORPORATE vs AM GOOSEN & ANO |
SEQUESTRATION |
|
39.
|
D6102/21 |
NP PHOSWA vs TF PHOSWA |
DIVORCES |
|
40.
|
D2548/21 |
GA HORCICKA vs NK HORCICKA |
DIVORCES |
|
41.
|
D5894/21 |
R PAPAYAN vs J PAPAYAN |
DIVORCES |
|
42.
|
D1864/21 |
BP MKITI vs KB MKITI |
DIVORCES |
|
43.
|
D5075/21 |
M GREEN vs BH GREEN |
DIVORCES |
|
44.
|
D2061/21 |
RS HATCHWELL vs JJ HATCHWELL |
DIVORCES |
|
45.
|
D4104/21 |
PP KESWA vs MM KESWA |
DIVORCES |
|
46.
|
D8380/20 D8537/20 |
GE OLIVIER vs PJ OLIVIER |
RULE 43 |
|
47.
|
D3687/21 |
M VAN ACHTERBERGH vs J VAN ACHTERBERGH |
RULE 43 |
|
48.
|
8824/17 |
VE NXUMALO vs THE MINISTER OF DEFENCE AND MILITARY VETERANS & ORS |
OPPOSED MOTION |
/rr
Legal Practitioners /Litigants are to take note of the allocated time for the hearing of their matters.
Non-appearances at the allocated time will result in matters been struck off the Roll, Matters will have to be set down again in the usual manner.
Stood down matters will be allocated a time slot after 12h00 by the Judge hearing the matter. Legal Practitioners must leave the court ‘precint’ and return at allocated times after 12h00.
Observing of social distancing: It is recommended that Legal Practitioners /Litigants arrive and be in attendance in the designated area outside the court building not later than 15 minutes before the allocated time on the roll. Legal Practitioners /Litigants will be allowed into the court building 5 matters at a time.
When Legal Practitioners /Litigants in a matter are finished, he/she will exit the courtroom and immediately exit the building.
Urgent matters will be dealt with after the roll or by another Court.