Court Roll: KwaZulu-Natal High Court (Durban)
You are here:
SAFLII >>
Databases >>
Court Roll: KwaZulu-Natal High Court (Durban) >>
2021 >>
[2021] ZAKZDHCRolls 85
| Noteup
| LawCite
KwaZulu-Natal High Court Roll (Durban) (29 June 2021)
Download original files |
PDF format
RTF formatIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
KWAZULU-NATAL LOCAL DIVISION, DURBAN
COMMENCING AT DURBAN ON TUESDAY, 29th JUNE 2021
TO BE HEARD BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE K PILLAY
EMAIL ADDRESS: ssomaru@judiciary.org.za (Sajala)
Landline: 031 362 5837
|
1.
|
D3746/21 |
S S MAPHUMULO vs HOME AFFAIRS & ORS |
URGENT |
|
2.
|
D5033/21 |
SIMISOURCE vs J S FOURIE & ANO |
URGENT |
|
3.
|
D5094/21 |
M J BEKKER N.O. & ANO vs E K ROGERS |
URGENT |
|
4.
|
D7523/20 |
D RAMPERSADH vs RAF |
DEFAULT J/MENT |
|
5.
|
D8125/20 |
R TETWAYO vs RAF |
DEFAULT J/MENT PROPERTY EXECUTABLE |
|
6.
|
D2310/21 |
FIRSTRAND BANK LTD vs N CHETRAM |
DEFAULT J/MENT PROPERTY EXECUTABLE |
|
7.
|
D8032/18 |
THE STD BANK OF SA LTD vs T I SHEZI & ANO |
DEFAULT J/MENT PROPERTY EXECUTABLE |
|
8.
|
D9052/19 |
NEBANK LTD vs B.R & M.M MOONSAMY |
DEFAULT J/MENT PROPERTY EXECUTABLE |
|
9.
|
D1771/19 |
THE STD BANK OF SA vs C KAMIGAN & ANO |
DEFAULT J/MENT PROPERTY EXECUTABLE |
|
10.
|
D5581/18 |
THE STD BANK OF SA LTD vs S J LONG |
DEFAULT J/MENT PROPERTY EXECUTABLE |
|
11.
|
D3941/20 |
THE STD BANK OF SA LTD vs S D NKUKHU & ANO |
DEFAULT J/MENT PROPERTY EXECUTABLE |
|
12.
|
D1243/21 |
C I A BHALLI vs MINISTER OF HOME AFFAIRS & ORS |
APPLICATION |
|
13.
|
D7867/20 |
S J CHIBAYA vs THE REFUGE APPEAL BOARD & ORS |
APPLICATION |
|
14.
|
D7869/20 |
S B KACHERE vs THE REFUGEE APPEAL BOARD & ORS |
APPLICATION |
|
15.
|
D6104/20 |
EX PARTE : L NGCOBO |
APPLICATION |
|
16.
|
D1212/21 |
J TOPAY vs STANDING COMMITTEE OF REFUGE APPEAL BOARD & ORS |
APPLICATION |
|
17.
|
D1435/20 |
N T KHUMALO vs THE MINISTER OF POLICE & ANO |
APPLICATION |
|
18.
|
D5576/20 |
Z P NDLOVU vs THE MINISTER OF POLICE |
APPLICATION |
|
19.
|
D942/21 |
R NAICKER vs E PILLAY |
APPLICATION |
|
20.
|
D9721/19 |
UCOSISELELO (PTY) LTD vs BODY CORPORATE OF BLINK ONNIE ROAD NO 69 |
APPLICATION |
|
21.
|
806/17 |
L F NGIDI vs RAF |
APPLICATION |
|
22.
|
D8076/19 |
D SMITH & ANO vs MINISTER OF POLICE |
APPLICATION |
|
23.
|
D10529/19 |
NEDBANK LTD vs IGORHA CONSTRUCTION CC |
APPLICATION |
|
24.
|
D618/20 |
N KHEPHU vs RAF |
APPLICATION |
|
25.
|
D619/20 |
S MAJOLA SIYASE vs RAF |
APPLICATION |
|
26.
|
D6611/18 |
RENASA INSURANCE CO LTD & ANO vs MIAMI AUTO RENOVATORS CC |
APPLICATION |
|
27.
|
D4143/21 |
EX PARTE : BASFOUR 3773 (PTY) LTD |
APPLICATION |
|
28.
|
D2603/21 |
A KRUGER vs J A KRUGER |
APPLICATION |
|
29.
|
D9122/20 |
T DE VOS vs E DE VOS |
DIVORCE |
|
30.
|
D6958/20 |
L KALIDIN vs V KALIDIN |
RULE 43 |
/mn
Legal Practitioners /Litigants are to take note of the allocated time for the hearing of their matters.
Non-appearances at the allocated time will result in matters been struck off the Roll, Matters will have to be set down again in the usual manner.
Stood down matters will be allocated a time slot after 12h00 by the Judge hearing the matter. Legal Practitioners must leave the court ‘precint’ and return at allocated times after 12h00.
Observing of social distancing: It is recommended that Legal Practitioners /Litigants arrive and be in attendance in the designated area outside the court building not later than 15 minutes before the allocated time on the roll. Legal Practitioners /Litigants will be allowed into the court building 5 matters at a time.
When Legal Practitioners /Litigants in a matter are finished, he/she will exit the courtroom and immediately exit the building.
Urgent matters will be dealt with after the roll or by another Court.