Court Roll: KwaZulu-Natal High Court (Durban)

You are here:
SAFLII >>
Databases >>
Court Roll: KwaZulu-Natal High Court (Durban) >>
2021 >>
[2021] ZAKZDHCRolls 88
| Noteup
| LawCite
KwaZulu-Natal High Court Roll (Durban) (2 July 2021)
Download original files |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
KWAZULU-NATAL LOCAL DIVISION, DURBAN
COMMENCING AT DURBAN ON FRIDAY, 02nd JULY 2021
TO BE HEARD BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE HENRIQUES
EMAIL ADDRESS: JPieterse@judiciary.org.za (Juanita)
Landline: 031 362 5805
1.
|
D5338/21 |
BALWIN PROPERTIES LTD vs DELANGOKUBONA BUSINESS FORUM & ORS |
URGENT APP |
2.
|
D5341/21 |
R PIETERSE vs A PIETERSE |
URGENT APP |
3.
|
D997/20 |
PROUDAFRIQUE TRADING 268 (PTY) LTD t/a KRYOLAN SA vs GROUP PERFORM INVESTMENTS (PTY) LTD & ORS |
DEFAULT JUDGMENT |
4.
|
D990/21 |
ETHEKWINI MUNICIPALITY vs HAMMARSDALE COTTAGE INDUSTRIES PTY LTD |
DEFAULT JUDGMENT |
5.
|
D6487/20 |
THE STD BANK OF SA LTD vs T MAZWI |
DEFAULT JUDGMENT FOR PROP EXECUTABLE |
6.
|
D229/21 |
FIRSTRAN BANK LTD vs R REDDY |
DEFAULT JUDGMENT FOR PROP EXECUTABLE |
7.
|
D6919/20 |
SB GUARANTEE CO (RF) PTY LTD vs SR MARITZ & ANO |
DEFAULT JUDGMENT FOR PROP EXECUTABLE |
8.
|
9218/20 |
STD BANK OF SA LTD vs SR MSWELI & ANO |
DEFAULT JUDGMENT FOR PROP EXECUTABLE |
9.
|
D7638/20 |
THE STD BANK OF SA LTD vs S MASEKO |
DEFAULT JUDGMENT FOR PROP EXECUTABLE |
10.
|
D1089/21 |
THE STD BANK OF SA LTD vs C JACK |
DEFAULT JUDGMENT FOR PROP EXECUTABLE |
11.
|
D4614/20 |
NEDBANK L T D vs S MDAKANE & ANO |
DEFAULT JUDGMENT FOR PROP EXECUTABLE |
11A.
|
D7594/20 |
THE STD BANK OF SA LTD vs SD MARAIS & ANO |
DEFAULT JUDGMENT FOR PROP EXECUTABLE |
12.
|
D9017/20 |
WESBANK, A DIVISION OF FIRSTRAND BANK vs LS MAJOLA |
SUMMARY JUDGMENT |
13.
|
D7520/20 |
ITHALA DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CO LTD vs GREEN GRID ENERGY PTY LTD |
SUMMARY JUDGMENT |
14.
|
D636/21 |
FIRSTRAND BANK LTD vs AUNTIE SELVIES CATERING CC & ANO |
SUMMARY JUDGMENT |
15.
|
D13722/18 |
LT MTHEMBU vs MEC FOR HEALTH FOR THE PROVINCE GOVERNMENT OF KZN |
APPLICATIONS |
16.
|
D7898/20 |
CA ZIQUBU vs ROAD ACCIDENT FUND |
APPLICATIONS |
17.
|
D3560/21 |
P NAICKER vs R BANSI & ORS |
APPLICATIONS |
18.
|
D3276/21 |
OL STEYN vs S KOORSEN |
APPLICATIONS |
19.
|
D7633/20 |
GJ CLOETE CC vs DHJ COETZEE (SNR) & ORS |
APPLICATIONS |
20.
|
D538/21 |
N DEVRAJ & ANO vs MS PILLAY & ANO |
APPLICATIONS |
21.
|
1879/12 |
NI NDLOVU vs THE MINISTER OF POLICE |
APPLICATIONS |
21A.
|
D3406/21 |
ZINI RIVER ESTAE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION vs MAKHANYE CONSULTING ENGINEERS (PTY) LTD & ANO |
APPLICATIONS |
22.
|
D3240/21 |
AS DASS vs MZ KAMAL & ORS |
APPLICATIONS |
23.
|
D3519/21 |
D GIANCHAND vs REGISTRAR OF DEEDS, PMB & ANO |
APPLICATIONS |
24.
|
D5431/19 |
C MURRAY N.O. & ORS vs RHIDAN INVESTMENTS 59 (PTY) LTD |
APPLICATIONS |
25.
|
D4482/21 |
OMTHIYA CONSULTING (PTY) LTD vs THE BODY CORPORATE OF NORTHRIDGE PARK |
APPLICATIONS |
26.
|
D5078/21 |
D GOVENDER & ANO vs ST. THERESA’S CHILDREN’S HOME & ORS |
APPLICATIONS |
27.
|
D2416/20 |
C MURRAY N.O. & ORS vs N MOODLEY N.O. & ANO |
APPLICATIONS |
28.
|
D2417/20 |
C MURRAY N.O. & ORS vs N MOODLEY N.O. & ANO |
APPLICATIONS |
29.
|
D6777/20 |
NA MCINEKA vs NM ZULU & ORS |
APPLICATIONS |
30.
|
7749/17 |
ABSA BANK LTD vs S NQAWUNQAQU TRADING & ANO |
APPLICATIONS |
31.
|
D3563/21 |
POLTRA NV vs CARGO SERV PTY LTD |
LIQUIDATIONS / WINDING-UP |
32.
|
D1871/21 |
FORCON COMMODITIES (PTY) LTD vs WEIS CNSTRUCTION (PTY) LTD |
LIQUIDATIONS / WINDING-UP |
33.
|
D7212/20 |
KINTRU TRUCK HIRE PTY LTD vs VC SON’S LOGISTICS CC |
LIQUIDATIONS / WINDING-UP |
34.
|
D4730/20 |
BETHEN BODY CORPORATE vs Z MPISI |
SEQUESTRATIONS |
35.
|
D3232/21 |
B BLOM vs N BLOM |
DIVORCES |
36.
|
D3408/21 |
ES MOTLHABANE vs A BHUIYAN |
DIVORCES |
37.
|
D7880/18 |
SR MACLOU vs A NAIDU |
DIVORCES |
38.
|
D10556/19 |
D RAGHUNATH vs A RAGUNATH |
DIVORCES |
39.
|
D4457/20 |
BZ MKHIZE vs LM ZONDI & ANO |
DIVORCES |
40.
|
D7218/20 |
D MANGARU vs W MANGARU |
DIVORCES |
41.
|
D8246/20 |
MP CHONCO vs NA CHONCO |
DIVORCES |
42.
|
D2753/20 |
L NGOBESE vs KK NGOBESE |
DIVORCES |
43.
|
1288/16 |
NP JIYANE vs E MNDAWENI |
DIVORCES |
44.
|
D8484/20 |
SL BISHOP vs RC BISHOP |
DIVORCES |
45.
|
D4877/19 |
SS PUGIN vs MT PUGIN |
DIVORCES |
46.
|
D3143/21 |
VS NAIDOO vs N NAIDOO |
RULE 43 |
/rr
Legal Practitioners /Litigants are to take note of the allocated time for the hearing of their matters.
Non-appearances at the allocated time will result in matters been struck off the Roll, Matters will have to be set down again in the usual manner.
Stood down matters will be allocated a time slot after 12h00 by the Judge hearing the matter. Legal Practitioners must leave the court ‘precint’ and return at allocated times after 12h00.
Observing of social distancing: It is recommended that Legal Practitioners /Litigants arrive and be in attendance in the designated area outside the court building not later than 15 minutes before the allocated time on the roll. Legal Practitioners /Litigants will be allowed into the court building 5 matters at a time.
When Legal Practitioners /Litigants in a matter are finished, he/she will exit the courtroom and immediately exit the building.
Urgent matters will be dealt with after the roll or by another Court.