Court Roll: KwaZulu-Natal High Court (Durban)
You are here:
SAFLII >>
Databases >>
Court Roll: KwaZulu-Natal High Court (Durban) >>
2021 >>
[2021] ZAKZDHCRolls 99
| Noteup
| LawCite
KwaZulu-Natal High Court Roll (Durban) (28 July 2021)
Download original files |
PDF format
RTF formatIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
KWAZULU-NATAL LOCAL DIVISION, DURBAN
COMMENCING AT DURBAN ON WEDNESDAY, 28th JULY 2021
TO BE HEARD BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE MOODLEY
EMAIL ADDRESS: BNtuli@judiciary.org.za (Mabongi)
Landline: 031 362 5832
|
1.
|
D5797/21 |
A NAIDOO vs SR NAIDOO & ORS |
URGENT APP |
|
2.
|
82/18 |
FIRSTRAND BANK LTD vs N AZUMTH & ANO |
URGENT APP |
|
3.
|
D5475/20 |
SAVE OUR BEREA & ORS vs K KNOOP N.O. & ORS |
URGENT APP |
|
4.
|
D4348/21 |
NZ NGCOBO vs ROAD ACCIDENT FUND |
DEFAULT JUDGMENT |
|
5.
|
D4349/21 |
XP MKHIZE vs ROAD ACCIDENT FUND |
DEFAULT JUDGMENT |
|
6.
|
D3568/20 |
TO NDLOVU vs ROAD ACCIDENT FUND |
DEFAULT JUDGMENT |
|
7.
|
D3308/20 |
M GONDWE vs ROAD ACCIDENT FUND |
DEFAULT JUDGMENT |
|
8.
|
D3501/20 |
MW JIYANE vs ROAD ACCIDENT FUND |
DEFAULT JUDGMENT |
|
9.
|
D2807/20 |
S VENGETASS vs ROAD ACCIDENT FUND |
DEFAULT JUDGMENT |
|
10.
|
D1970/21 |
CDJ ROSSOUW vs ROAD ACCIDENT FUND |
DEFAULT JUDGMENT |
|
11.
|
D6667/20 |
ES NXUMALO vs ROAD ACCIDENT FUND |
DEFAULT JUDGMENT |
|
12.
|
D5916/20 |
NB NGCOBO vs ROAD ACCIDENT FUND |
DEFAULT JUDGMENT |
|
13.
|
D2378/20 |
K ZULU vs ROAD ACCIDENT FUND |
DEFAULT JUDGMENT |
|
14.
|
D233/21 |
STD BANK OF SA LTD vs R EPSTEIN |
DEFAULT JUDGMENT FOR PROP EXECUTABLE |
|
15.
|
D3941/20 |
THE STD BANK OF SA LTD vs SD NKUKHU & ANO |
DEFAULT JUDGMENT FOR PROP EXECUTABLE |
|
16.
|
D13701/18 |
FIRSTRAND BANK LTD vs JKC COLEMAN & ANO |
DEFAULT JUDGMENT FOR PROP EXECUTABLE |
|
17.
|
D2060/21 |
FIRSTRAND BANK vs A DUKHI & ORS |
DEFAULT JUDGMENT FOR PROP EXECUTABLE |
|
18.
|
D9683/19 |
CHANGING TIDES 17 (PTY) LTD vs Y PILLAY & ANO |
DEFAULT JUDGMENT FOR PROP EXECUTABLE |
|
19.
|
D7559/19 |
L NAIDOO vs ROAD ACCIDENT FUND |
APPLICATIONS |
|
20.
|
D5502/20 |
FMHC RENTAL CC vs VG MCHUNU & ORS |
APPLICATIONS |
|
21.
|
D1585/18 |
S NABY vs ROAD ACCIDENT FUND |
APPLICATIONS |
|
22.
|
D5390/21 |
THEKWINI TVET COLLEGE vs T NGCAMU & ORS |
APPLICATIONS |
|
23.
|
D9500/19 |
T NAIDOO vs ROAD ACCIDENT FUND |
APPLICATIONS |
|
24.
|
D4346/21 |
A HARIBANS & ANO vs P NAIDOO & ORS |
APPLICATIONS |
|
25.
|
20527/04 |
R REINDERS N.O. vs THE BODY CORPORATE OF BRISTOW CRESCENT |
APPLICATIONS |
|
26.
|
D134/20 |
I SITYEBI vs ROAD ACCIDENT FUND |
APPLICATIONS |
|
27.
|
D3751/21 |
HHBC PROPERTY INVESTMENT vs STRYSBAR PROPERTIES & ORS |
APPLICATIONS |
|
28.
|
D7212/18 |
I-DISCOUNTING (PTY) LTD vs RD NELSON |
APPLICATIONS |
|
29.
|
1162/18 |
STD BANK OF SA LTD vs A VORAJEE |
APPLICATIONS |
|
30.
|
D1633/21 |
PN MNGONYAMA vs ROAD ACCIDENT FUND |
APPLICATIONS |
|
31.
|
12703/17 |
STD BANK OF SA LTD vs S & A COMMODITIES CC & ANO |
APPLICATIONS |
|
32.
|
D05/21 |
M GOVENDER vs ROAD ACCIDENT FUND |
APPLICATIONS |
|
33.
|
D3786/21 B |
NEDBANK LTD vs MASTER OF THE HIGH COURT & ANO |
APPLICATIONS |
|
34.
|
D1551/19 |
T BUTHELEZI vs MINISTER OF POLICE |
APPLICATIONS |
|
35.
|
D373/19 |
SC MAGWAZA vs ROAD ACCIDENT FUND |
APPLICATIONS |
|
36.
|
D4697/18 |
RZ SIKIBI obo S SIKIBI vs ROAD ACCIDENT FUND |
APPLICATIONS |
|
37.
|
10063/17 |
SENEKAL FAMILIE BOEROENY PTY LTD vs THE COMMISSIONER FOR THE SOUTH |
APPLICATIONS |
|
38.
|
D5094/21 |
MJ BEKKER N.O. & ANO vs EK ROGERS |
LIQUIDATIONS / WINDING-UP |
|
39.
|
D1113/21 |
M HAYWOOD N.O. & ANO vs K PILLAY |
SEQUESTRATIONS |
|
40.
|
D4083/21 |
LE SHORT vs CA SHORT |
DIVORCES |
|
41.
|
D1666/21 B |
JG MCLEOD vs CH MCLEOD |
DIVORCES |
|
42.
|
D4708/21 |
CV RULVENIS vs A KITLAS |
DIVORCES |
|
43.
|
D4322/21 |
PD MAHARAJ vs AR MAHARAJ |
RULE 43 |
|
44.
|
4656/18 |
PANDA PETROLEUM CC vs UMHLATHUZE MUNICIPALITY
(1 HOUR) |
OPPOSED MOTION |
|
45.
|
6131/19 |
KB NTULI & ANO vs KB NTULI & ORS
(1 HOUR) |
OPPOSED MOTION |
/rr
Legal Practitioners /Litigants are to take note of the allocated time for the hearing of their matters.
Non-appearances at the allocated time will result in matters been struck off the Roll, Matters will have to be set down again in the usual manner.
Stood down matters will be allocated a time slot after 12h00 by the Judge hearing the matter. Legal Practitioners must leave the court ‘precint’ and return at allocated times after 12h00.
Observing of social distancing: It is recommended that Legal Practitioners /Litigants arrive and be in attendance in the designated area outside the court building not later than 15 minutes before the allocated time on the roll. Legal Practitioners /Litigants will be allowed into the court building 5 matters at a time.
When Legal Practitioners /Litigants in a matter are finished, he/she will exit the courtroom and immediately exit the building.
Urgent matters will be dealt with after the roll or by another Court.